No on 8!

Thursday, November 20, 2008

In monastery's ashes, a 'cleansing by fire'

LOS ANGELES: On Tuesday, the monks met with their insurance agent.

Like thousands of other residents of Southern California, the seven Benedictine Anglican monks who lived at Mount Calvary Monastery and Retreat House, on a breathtaking ridge 1,250 feet, or 380 meters, above the Pacific in Montecito, were coming to terms with what they had lost in the fires that have swept across Southern California since Thursday.

Early last Friday, fire consumed most of the complex where the monks had chanted, studied the stars and welcomed guests from around the world. The next afternoon, they returned to survey the damage.

"We were very quiet," Brother Joseph Brown recalled in a telephone interview on Tuesday. "We just looked around. We were in shock."

By the time what is known as the Tea Fire, in Santa Barbara County, was under control, all that remained of the 60-year-old monastery itself were a skeletal archway, a charred iron cross and a large Angelus bell.

Two small artists' studios near the main building were intact. An icon of Christ that Brown had been painting with pigments made from egg yolk and mineral powder was still on a desk. A cello sat a few feet away, unharmed. In the chaos of wind and fire, a sheriff's deputy had moved another monk's telescope outside, where it remained unscathed.

"In the midst of all this destruction," Brown, 46, said Tuesday, "miracles happened all over the place."

"The feelings right now are difficult to describe. One of the hazards of monasticism throughout the centuries is we become attached to what we have or where we are. This is simply a reminder that what we are called to is not our stuff. This is a cleansing by fire."

Since the fire, the monks have stayed at St. Mary's Retreat House, run by Episcopal nuns near the Santa Barbara Mission, as they searched for solace and prepared themselves to help others in the area who were displaced by the blaze.

Brown said the monks, part of the Order of the Holy Cross, spent much of Tuesday meeting with an insurance agent and a contractor to discuss their options. Though the coastal mountains of Montecito were dear to their hearts, he said, they "need time to pray and discern" whether to rebuild there, and if so, how to go about it.

Residents of mansions and mobile home parks alike found the trappings of their communities devoured by the Tea Fire, the Sayre Fire in Orange County and the Freeway Complex Fire in Los Angeles County.

The state has spent $75 million responding to the three fires, which burned over 40,000 acres, or more than 16,000 hectares, and destroyed 858 homes, the state Office of Emergency Services said. In Santa Barbara County, the Tea Fire was 100 percent contained, state fire officials said Tuesday, though firefighters continued to battle hot spots. The other two fires were 70 to 75 percent contained, officials said.

When orange flames sprouted on a ridge below the wood and adobe buildings on Thursday evening, the monks and 25 guests, leaders of local nonprofit groups, had just gathered for dinner. They continued eating for several minutes, Brown said, but as wind-whipped flames grew larger, they decided to evacuate. He and the other monks rose from the table and told their guests it was time to go.

"We very calmly and quietly and efficiently and without great gravity got folks' stuff out of their rooms," and packed up their cars. The monks, he said, stayed a bit longer, grabbing what they could.

Brother Nicholas Radelmiller, the monastery's prior, who has lived there for 18 years, carried a century-old painting of the Virgin of Guadalupe under his arm. Others grabbed two 600-year-old paintings, a cash box, laptops and a change of clothes.

Radelmiller, 68, was the only one to get his habit, a white robe with billowing sleeves. The 6-inch-, or 15-centimeter-long, ebony cross he received at his ordination 38 years ago was tucked into the pocket.

The habit and cross, Brown said, are a monk's only personal possessions. The fire destroyed antique Spanish furniture, oil paintings, books and cherished photographs, he added, but the loss of their habits and crosses stung most. Even in that, though, he found comfort.

"We are stripping away the outward symbols that eternally rest in our hearts," Brown said.

Bonfire blamed for wildfire

A group of college students who lit a ridge-top bonfire is being blamed for accidentally sparking one of three ferocious wildfires that collectively destroyed about 1,000 homes and blackened more than 65 square miles, or 170 square kilometers, The Associated Press reported from Los Angeles.


More of In monastery's ashes, a 'cleansing by fire'

Views on Prop 8

After the passage of California's Proposition 8, the ballot initiative in California that stripped LGBT people of their constitutional right to marry, many clergy and people of faith around the country have been offering solace and encouragement to their lesbian, gay and bisexual congregants and neighbors. We wanted to share a few examples of these with you.

Religion Council Member Rev. Susan Russell writes, "It is always a deep joy and amazing privilege to be invited into the profound intimacy of two beloveds making their love tangible in vows professed and rings exchanged in the sight of God and of the community gathered. Over the last 140 days, as couples invited us into that holy space with them, their joy was often accompanied by a sense of urgency. And that urgency included a pinch of anxiety labeled 'Proposition 8' — giving the traditional words from the marriage vows, 'Those whom God has joined together let no one put asunder' new power."

Read more reflections from people of faith on Susan's blog, An Inch at a Time: Reflections on the Journey.

Watch the Unitarian Universalist Denomination's moving video taken from images of LGBT couples who are "standing on the side of love."

Remember: Faith Communities Can Save Transgender Lives

The Transgender Day of Remembrance (November 20, 2008) is set aside to
remember those lost to anti-transgender violence in the last year. Much of
this violence is fueled by a sentiment that it is tacitly and explicitly
reinforced by narrow understandings of gender, as well as outright
transphobia and homophobia expressed in the name of a Christian God. Too
many of us have not only heard "God condemns you" -- but also "It would be
better if you were dead."

It is a profound and important step for every faith community to join in a
resounding chorus that condemns all forms of violence against people who are
differently gendered.

* By vocally condemning anti-trans bullying, harassment, and hate crimes, we
begin to chip away at the self-righteous fuel that feeds those who believe
they are doing God's will by punishing the differently gendered.

* By loudly proclaiming that people of all genders are beloved, we begin to
address the rampant rate of depression and suicide among transgender youth
and adults that so to often encouraged by religious judgment.
* By reaching out in love to the transgender community, we begin to
undermine the isolation and low self-esteem that can undergird substance
abuse and high-risk behaviors (which inform high rates of HIV and AIDS).
Beyond the hate and judgment, trans people's lives are at risk because we so
often struggle to meet our most fundamental needs such as safe employment
and basic health care. Faith communities need to be out in front of such
justice issues as well.
 
So, this year, let us (re)commit ourselves to the work of speaking up and
speaking out, to the work of educating ourselves and educating others, to
the work of reaching out in love.
Chris Paige
Publisher, TransFaith Online
Followup reading:
* NCTE Health Priorities: http://www.nctequality.org/HealthPriorities.pdf
* TransFaith InterSections: www.transfaithonline.org/intersections/
* TransFaith - Where do we begin?
www.transfaithonline.org/the_basics/where_do_i_begin/

Friday, November 14, 2008

S.C. priest: No communion if you voted Obama

The Rev. Jay Scott Newman, a Roman Catholic priest in South Carolina, doesn't want his parishioners taking communion if they voted for Barack Obama, at least not until after they do penance for it.

The Associated Press reports on a letter Newman distributed Sunday in which he wrote:

Our nation has chosen for its chief executive the most radical pro-abortion politician ever to serve in the United States Senate or to run for president...

Voting for a pro-abortion politician when a plausible pro-life alternative exits constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil, and those Catholics who do so place themselves outside of the full communion of Christ's Church and under the judgment of divine law. Persons in this condition should not receive Holy Communion until and unless they are reconciled to God in the Sacrament of Penance, lest they eat and drink their own condemnation.

S.C. priest: No communion if you voted Obama

 

Monday, November 10, 2008

Catholics, Mormons allied to pass Prop. 8

Months before the first ads would run on Proposition 8, San Francisco Catholic Archbishop George Niederauer reached out to a group he knew well, Mormons.

Niederauer had made critical inroads into improving Catholic-Mormon relations while he was Bishop of Salt Lake City for 11 years. And now he asked them for help on Prop. 8, the ballot measure that sought to ban same-sex marriages in California.

The June letter from Niederauer drew in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and proved to be a critical move in building a multi-religious coalition - the backbone of the fundraising, organizing and voting support for the successful ballot measure. By bringing together Mormons and Catholics, Niederauer would align the two most powerful religious institutions in the Prop. 8 battle.

Ironically, it made San Francisco, center of the nation's gay community, a nexus in the fight against the recently gained gay right to marry.

This Catholic-Mormon alliance was part of a broad pattern that underscored a critical difference between the rival campaigns: Yes on 8 sought to marshal support among many religions, while the No on 8 campaign often put religion on the sidelines.

"People of faith, really of every faith, believed that marriage was between man and a woman," said Frank Schubert, political consultant to the Yes on 8 campaign. "They formed the core of our volunteer operation. They were largely responsible for the 70,000 contributions we got."

Some clergy within the No on 8 campaign believed not enough respect was paid to religion.

"Their focus really wasn't upon communities of faith," said the Rev. Roland Stringfellow, who works with the Center for Gay and Lesbian Studies at the Pacific School of Religion in Berkeley and was an active organizer in the No on 8 campaign. Stringfellow said No on 8's relative neglect of religion had a particularly profound effect on Latinos and African Americans, who hold strong religious views. "I really didn't note particular outreaches to communities of color."

Exit polls data

Exit polls show that religious views had a profound effect on the result, spanning racial lines:

-- 84 percent of those who attend church weekly voted yes.

-- 81 percent of white evangelicals voted yes.

-- 65 percent of white Protestants voted yes.

-- 64 percent of Catholics voted yes. Catholics accounted for 30 percent of all voters.

A late push by many churches to win over their congregations played a decisive role in increasing turnout and swaying opinion, said Mark DiCamillo, director of the Field Poll, who analyzed the figures.

The last Field Poll, conducted a week before the election, showed that weekly churchgoers increased their support in the final week from 72 percent to 84 percent. Catholic support increased from 44 percent to 64 percent - a jump that accounted for 6 percent of the total California electorate and equivalent to the state's entire African American population combined.

The shift in Catholics alone more than accounted for Prop. 8's 5 percent margin of victory.

"The Sunday before the election is just a very influential time for churchgoers," said DiCamillo. For religious conservatives, "there was a lot of interest and attention and concern on this whole issue, but they brought it to a big conclusion on the final weekend."

Stringfellow, who organized No on 8 religious events in the East Bay and San Francisco, said the No on 8 campaign's talking points initially didn't have language to address religious groups. In addition, he said, No on 8 campaigners were told by strategists not to discuss children, an issue that has particular significance for family-oriented religious groups.

Missed opportunities

Stringfellow believes the campaign was afraid it would get smeared by allegations tying homosexuality to pedophilia. But he believes it was wrong to avoid the subject of children because gays and lesbians are just as capable as straight people of being good parents. "When the Yes on 8 folks talked about children, we really didn't have anywhere to go with it," he said.

Stringfellow said the No on 8 campaign was wrong to downplay lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender couples in advertisements. "It's not going to be normalized if you hide over here in the corner," he said. "There's nothing wrong with talking about love between two individuals."

The future for the religious coalition that supported Prop. 8 is unclear.

"I don't know if it could be assembled again," said Schubert, the Yes on 8 consultant. "It came together because of the unique nature of marriage, and how it carries across every ideological and theological boundary."

Mormon church members undertook a perhaps unprecedented mobilization, contributing an estimated 40 percent of the individual donations made to the Yes on 8's $30 million-plus campaign. Yet the Salt Lake City church, which did not contribute to the campaign, sees its involvement in politics as unusual.

"I don't think there's any sense in the church that this coalition has more life beyond this one issue," said Mike Otterson, a church spokesman. "We haven't created a permanent alliance of churches here. What we did here was we came together to protect traditional marriage."

E-mail Matthai Kuruvila at mkuruvila@sfchronicle.com.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/11/10/MNU1140AQQ.DTL

 

Catholics, Mormons allied to pass Prop. 8

Friday, November 07, 2008

Quincy members vote to leave Episcopal Church, align with Southern Cone

 [Episcopal News Service, Quincy, Illinois] A majority of delegates to the 131st annual synod of the Diocese of Quincy voted on November 7 to leave the Episcopal Church and realign the diocese under the jurisdiction of the Anglican Province of the Southern Cone, which covers the southern portion of South America.

The action was carried out by the passing of two resolutions. The first formally annulled accession to "the constitution and canons of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America."

The resolution stated that the General Convention and leaders of the Episcopal Church "have failed to uphold the teaching and authority of Holy Scripture, have challenged or belittled core doctrines of the Christian faith, have refused to conform to the agreed teaching and discipline of the Anglican faith, have refused to conform to the agreed teaching and discipline of the Anglican Communion, and have rejected the godly counsel of the leaders of the Communion."

Members of Quincy's leadership, including former diocesan bishop Keith Ackerman, who retired on November 1, have been at odds with the wider church over such theological issues as the church's attitude toward homosexuality.

The vote on the resolution to leave the Episcopal Church was taken by orders. Members of the clergy voted 41 to 14 in favor of the resolution. Lay delegates voted 54 to 12 in favor of the resolution.

The second resolution stated that the Diocese of Quincy "wishes to accept the gracious invitation extended by the Anglican Church of the Southern Cone in November, 2007, to offer membership to extra-provincial dioceses on an emergency basis."

On the resolution to join the Southern Cone, clergy voted 46 to 4 in favor.  Lay delegates voted 55 to 8 to approve the resolution.

Immediately following the vote, delegates were read a letter from Archbishop Gregory Venables, primate, or national bishop, of the Southern Cone, welcoming the Diocese of Quincy into his jurisdiction.

In the letter, Venables announced that he has appointed the Rev. Canon Ed den Blaauwen, a member of Quincy's governing standing committee, as Vicar General of the diocese, in the absence of a sitting bishop.

The Southern Cone includes the countries of Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay. It also includes members from the San Joaquin and Pittsburgh dioceses of the Episcopal Church.

Friday, October 31, 2008


Site feed @ http://www.oasiscalifornia.org/news/atom.xml

* Tags =

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Prop 8 & The Roman Catholic Church: One VIew



* Tags =

Monday, October 27, 2008

Some Mormons upset at church's Proposition 8 campaign

Some Mormons upset at church's Proposition 8 campaign
The LDS Church is campaigning on behalf of California's Proposition 8, which would restrict marriage rights. It's the biggest campaign for the church since their battles against the Equal Rights Amendment, according to this article. But many church members are unhappy with the move into divisive politics. The Salt Lake Tribune (Utah)

Episcopal Diocese of Southeast Florida's bishop opposes Amendment 2!

Dear Sisters and Brothers,

After prayerful consideration, I have decided that it is my duty as a
Christian, and as your bishop, to urge the defeat of the proposed Amendment
2 to our Florida Constitution, which would define marriage as only between a
man and a woman. It seems to me that if we are to be faithful to our Lord's
commandment to love our neighbors as ourselves, we should not be enshrining
in our state's constitution this discriminatory and potentially harmful
language.

Not only would the passage of Amendment 2 infringe upon our religious
liberty by imposing a single religious definition of marriage on all
Floridians, regardless of their beliefs; but because of its wording, this
amendment could also deny many important benefits to all unmarried
Floridians.

While the amendment is clearly aimed at same-sex relationships, we know that
among our state's large population of retired persons there are also
heterosexual couples who have not married for fear of losing a portion of
their individual Social Security or pension benefits. In recent years these
persons, as well as partners in committed same-sex relationships, have been
able to receive protection for their rights under domestic partnership laws.
I cannot see how we can say we love our neighbors if we pass an amendment
that could put at risk for these couples such rights as the ability to visit
or to participate in medical choices for each other in illness or at the
point of death.

Faithful people have a wide range of opinions on the matter of same-sex
unions. Like our own Episcopal Church and the worldwide Anglican Communion,
many other branches of Christianity, as well other faiths, are currently
engaged in challenging conversations about their own doctrines and policies
concerning marriage.

Despite this ongoing disagreement among people of good conscience, Florida
has already passed a law that defines marriage as the proposed amendment
would. However, some supporters of Amendment 2 have argued that a
constitutional amendment is necessary to protect clergy from being forced to
perform or recognize marriages that are contrary to their doctrine. I
believe this fear is unfounded: Because of the religious freedom guaranteed
by the First Amendment to the US Constitution, no religious group can be
forced to recognize all forms of marriage sanctioned by the civil
authorities. (For example, the State allows for and recognizes marriage
after divorce; the Roman Catholic Church does not. No Roman Catholic priest
is obligated by law to officiate at the marriage of any divorced person.)

Along with clergy from a broad spectrum of religious traditions, with
diverse views regarding marriage, I have added my signature to a statement
opposing Amendment 2. This statement can be found at
www.flclergyforfairness.org.

I believe that Amendment 2 is unnecessary, potentially hurtful, and a threat
to our cherished freedom of religion, and I urge you to vote against it on
November 4.

Faithfully,

+Leo Frade

Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Southeast Florida

Jeffrey Altman will be ordained an 'Anglican' - but not Episcopal - priest today

Jeffrey Altman will be ordained an Anglican priest today in a ceremony that reflects Central New York's role in the nationwide growth of a separate Anglican church in the United States.

Altman will lead Sunday services at Westside Anglican Fellowship, a Geddes congregation of about 25 people who began worshipping together after their former congregation, St. Andrew's Episcopal Church in Syracuse, split from the local Episcopal Diocese. They meet at Syracuse Vineyard Church.

It is one of dozens of breakaway congregations that have started Anglican communities in the five years since the U.S. Episcopal Church consecrated an openly gay bishop. FourÕ7AltmanÕ groups from three churches in the Episcopal Diocese of Central New York have split from the 2.2 million-member national Episcopal Church.

See Ordination spotlights church rift
The Post-Standard - Syracuse.com, NY

Blog Archive

Search for more LGBT News

Google
 

Book & DVDS News: